Logdigi,LLC provides the lowest price well log scanning, the highest quality, and the fastest well log scanning service. Logidigi's well log scanninging fee is much cheaper than other scanning company.

Well Log Interpretation, Geology Analysis, Consulting Services. With our experienced professionals and using proprietary software, we provide our services at a. For example, if the calibration was off in one well, you can fix it with a bulk shift or gain and offset. PowerLog petrophysics software supports dual interval display during multi-well editing—you simply identify a soft interval and a hard interval and use them to calibrate the entire log.

Well Log, Map Scanning Price: the lowest price in this industry for scanning paper well log and map. Negotiable Price can decrease your cost. No extra charge for rush orders.

Convert paper log to tiff image digital log within 10 seconds

Accommodate order large and small, rush or long term

With our experienced professionals and using proprietary software, we provide our services at a higher quality, in a shorter period of time, and with affordable cost. LogDigi offers well-logging analysis and interpretation services. Logdigi's well-logging analysts will give our customers a valuable report and further high quality services. LogDigi cooperates with Petroleum Recovery, LLC (PR) production service company to joint venture to develop semi-depleted oil field in Texas.

Bureau of Economic Geology, the University of Texas at Austin Thank you very much for the demonstration of your new log analysis software on June 12 and 13, 1995. The software based on the derivative techniques is really good for evaluating a variety of sandstone reservoirs, especially for those with extremely low resistivities. I think that your software has the potential to become a very popular log analysis package. I would really like to see further development in your software in the near future. ---- Bureau of Economic Geology

See more examples of Low Resistivity PaysIn the process of drilling a well or once a well is drilled, a well-log analyst takes measurements to evaluate the wells potential to produce. Sometimes it is possible to cut core samples from the formation. If this is done, the core sample is tested in a lab to determine its lithology, porosity, and permeability. Many more specialized tests may be run on the core sample once it is retrieved from the well. However, many times costly core sample can not be taken from the well, thus sophisticated electron, nuclear, and acoustic tools are sent down the well on a wire-line. Information from these tools is sent up the well-bore to a computer system on the surface. Trained engineers retrieve and interpret the data. This can prove to be valuable information, helping the petroleum engineer determine if it is financially feasible to drill deeper, produce the well from explored zones of interest or take additional measurements. Working in conjunction with geologist, reservoir, and production engineers the well-log analyst will work with the team to decide where the next well should be drilled.

90% old oil wells do not have Nuclear and Sonic logging. For many oil companies, in order to re-exame their oil fields, they have to sent down sophisticated nuclear, and acoustic tools on a wire-line for the well. It costs them a lot to do that.

We re-evaluate your oil fields with your existing logs. We do not need 'many times costly core sample taken from the well', and 'sophisticated nuclear, and acoustic tools are sent down the well on a wire-line'. What we need just gamma ray (or SP),and resistivity. We can match your budget to re-evaluate your oil fields.

We determine the fluid and pressure distributions throughout the reservoir, the natural energy sources available, and the methods most useful in recovering the maximum amount of oil or gas from the reservoir.

We analyze, interpret, and optimize the performance of individual wells. We decides if it is economically feasible to make the investment needed to produce the well. If it is, the production engineer is given the tasks to determined how to bring this valuable fluid to the surface.

We analyze data to locate drilling sites where oil and gas may have accumulated in commercial quantities.

Why Invest in Oil and Gas Wells? Some of the world's wealthiest individuals and companies made their fortunes in oil and gas!

POTENTIAL HIGH FINANCIAL REWARDS Return of Capital in as little as 12 to 24 months.
Better than 10 to 1 Potential Return on Investment.
Greater than 50% Annual Rate of Return.
Add balance and serve as a hedge for 'stock and mutual fund heavy' portfolios.

RISK Focus on development of existing fields with proven reserves, thereby reducing or eliminating the risk of 'wildcatting' dryholes.
Reduce risk by utilizing state-of-the-art technologies not available even 10 years ago.
Available projects would be economically attractive if oil and gas prices fall 30%.

TAX BENEFITS Drilling and Recompletions are the very best tax advantaged investments.
Congress gives tax breaks to individual investors that are not available to large companies.
Up to 100% tax deductible .. 65 to 80% (Intangilbles) can be written off in first year.
15% of revenue is tax-free with depletion allowance.
Learn More

DRILLING PROSPECT AVAILABILITY Small drilling and recompletion prospects are better than ever (and there are more of them).

COMPETITION The large oil and gas companies have gone offshore and overseas in search of finding the 'big' oil fields.
Over 10,000 oil companies have left the U.S. fields since 1982.

DEMAND/CONSUMPTION Petroleum demand in the U.S. requires nearly 60% of oil to be imported from foreign nations.
Natural gas is difficult and expensive to store. U.S. consumption of natural gas has outstripped production in recent years, leading to soaring gas prices.

GOVERNMENT Encourages domestic drilling with special tax breaks.
Mandating natural gas usage over oil and coal.
Natural gas is now deregulated.

WINDOW OF OPPORTUNITY Traditional sources of drilling money are no longer available, which is a bonanza for accredited investors. Oil and Gas prices are projected to stay at high levels for at least the next 5 years.
The advent of well logging in the 1920s and its subsequent development into a sophisticated technology revolutionized the oil and gas exploration and production industry. The ability to 'look and measure' such things as formation type, formation dip, porosity, fluid type and other important factors transformed the drilling and completion of oil and gas wells from an ill-defined art into a refined science. Logging development encompasses three major areas: electric logging, sonic or acoustic logging, and nuclear logging. An understanding of their development is an understanding of the industry's technical progress.

Electric logging

The genesis of electric well logging resides with Conrad Schlumberger, who while a physics professor at the Ecole de Mines de Paris, France, conceived the idea of prospecting for metal ore deposits by using their electrical conductivity to distinguish them from their less conductive surroundings. One of the first tests, according to Schlumberger historians, was performed in his bathtub, which was filled with various rocks for the experiment. Working with his brother Marcel Schlumberger, Conrad began a series of test surface surveys in Europe, Africa and North America over a 3-year period. Their discoveries included an oil-productive salt dome in Romania, a precursor of things to come.
In 1926, the brothers formed Societe de Prospection Electrique and began to develop the theory that adding resistivity information from deeper formations would increase the effectiveness of their surface prospecting. By lowering an electric sonde down a 1,600-ft (488- m) well in France's Pechelbronn field Sept. 5, 1927, the brothers created the first well log. This log was painstakingly recorded point by point, meter by meter, using makeshift equipment and then plotted by stitching together the successive readings (Figure 1). The technology worked simply. Three electrodes - A, M and N - are lowered to the bottom of the wellbore on three insulated wires. Current from electrode A passes through the drilling mud and spreads out into the formation. The potentials measured at M and N are transmitted to the surface where they are measured. By measuring the potential difference between M and N, and the strength of current from A, the apparent formation resistivity is calculated (Figure 2). Following the initial success with the first electric resistivity logs, logging technology began to develop rapidly. In 1931, the accidental discovery of spontaneous potential (SP), produced naturally by the borehole mud at the boundaries of the permeable beds, led to an innovative new logging technique - simultaneously recording SP and resistivity curves. This technique enabled producers to differentiate permeable oil-bearing beds from impermeable, nonproducing ones. By 1936, the industry could augment resistivity logs with formation sample takers, automatic film recorders and multispacing resistivity curves for deep wells. The 1940s were a period of rapid development in logging technology despite the intervention of World War II. In 1941, logging took another major step forward with the introduction of the spontaneous-potential dipmeter, which greatly improved the vertical resolution of openhole logs. The tool allowed the calculation of a layer's dip - the deviation of that layer from true horizontal - and the direction of the dip. This measurement was improved further with the resistivity dipmeter in 1947 and the continuous resistivity dipmeter in 1952.
During the 1940s, development in other areas forced innovations in logging. One of the most important was the introduction of oil-based mud (OBM) in the Rangely, Colo., oil fields in 1948. OBMs are nonconductive. Normally configured electrical surveys require a conductive mud (water-based) system.1 The solution to logging in OBMs was the induction log, developed in the late 1940s. In induction logging, 'high-frequency AC of constant intensity is sent through a transmitter coil. The alternating magnetic field thus created induces secondary currents in the formation (that) flow in circular ground-loop paths coaxial with the transmitter coil. These ground-loop currents, in turn, create magnetic fields that induce signals in the receiver coil. The induced receiver signals are essentially proportional to the conductivity of the formation.'2 Throughout the 1950s and 1960s, electric logging continued to develop, but it was the computerized processing of logs that catapulted the sector ahead in 1962. Computerization allowed much faster log processing, thereby allowing the dramatic expansion of log
During the next three decades, sonic logging moved into several measurement fields, including:

porosity measurement;

cement bond evaluation;

fracture detection;

lithology determination;

mechanical rock properties measurement;

borewall and casing inspection;

seismic calibration;

abnormal formation pressure detection; and

gas-bearing formations identification.
Although nuclear logging has supplanted some of its functions, acoustic logging remains a vital part of the logging suite and regularly is run in some form in combination logging tools.

Nuclear logging

Logging using radiation of nuclear origin got its start in 1940. The initial nuclear logging tools recorded 'the natural gamma radiation emitted by the formations crossed through by boreholes. Of the three identified nuclear radiations - alpha, beta and gamma - only gamma radiation, which is of the electromechanical type, can be used in well logging because it alone has sufficient penetrating power to go through the formation and the steel casing.'
From passive radioactive monitoring in the gamma ray tool, the logging industry moved rapidly to active nuclear bombardment and measurement. In a formation density log, first introduced in 1962, the borehole wall is irradiated with a gamma ray source. A gamma ray counter then records the reflected rays. The number of gamma rays returned vs. those diffused relates to the density of the formation. The industry took nuclear logging one step further with the introduction of neutron logs in the late 1960s. Neutron logs also measure returned gamma rays, but in this instance, those generated by fast- or slow-moving neutrons. Neutrons are emitted by mixed radioactive sources. 'Most of the (neutron's) energy lost is done so during collisions with hydrogen nuclei … After having traveled a certain distance, a neutron becomes 'thermal' or 'slow' and is captured by an atom, which emits a capture gamma ray.'6 Since the distance a neutron can travel without hitting a hydrogen nuclei varies with the amount of hydrogen present, both porosity and formation contents can be determined. The original neutron logs were augmented later by pulsed neutron logs and neutron spectroscopy logs.
One of the biggest breakthroughs in recent logging history has been the advent of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) logging. The technology has proven more potentially beneficial and more confounding than its early developers could have imagined.
NMR tools function by creating a magnetic field in the borehole and then sending out pulses that polarize the hydrogen in water, oil and gas in the formation. As these hydrogen nuclei realign themselves to the original magnetic field, they induce signals in the tool's receiver, which are recorded by electronics. The amplitude of the signal relates directly to porosity, and the signal relaxation time relates to the size of the pore spaces containing fluids, providing an indication of permeability. NMR is a fluids-only measurement; however, due to the interactions of the pore fluids with rock surfaces, the rock matrix can significantly influence the fluid response.
The technology has existed since the early 1960s, but it has taken several decades to refine the process, with Numar - now a Halliburton subsidiary - the first to bring a continuous NMR logging tool to the market. The result has been an offering of tools and associated products that provide better depth of investigation and more information than ever before while traveling at the same pace as a traditional triple combo.

Pipe-conveyed logging

For at least two decades, highly deviated holes have required loggers to run their suites of tools on pipe. Initially those efforts took the form of traditional logging tools run on coiled tubing with electric line run inside the tubing. Almost instantaneous information received continually at the surface - now known as logging-while-drilling (LWD) and measurement-while-drilling (MWD) - while the well was being drilled had always been a goal. That goal was within range of the sophisticated logging tools by the advent of the combination tools in the early 1960s. The barrier to earlier implementation of MWD and LWD was not the logging tools but the method by which to send the information to the surface while drilling with jointed pipe. As it turns out, a key advance in logging tools was not another logging technology but rather mud-pulse technology, which allows nearcontinual transmittal of logging information from tools on the bottom of the drillstring to processors at the surface through measurement of short, varying variances in mud pressure created by a component of the logging suite downhole. It is possible to employ almost any logging suite combination on the bottom of drillpipe and log the hole as it is drilled. While some operators remain reluctant to allow decisions on a well to be made solely on MWD/LWD logs, reliability and correlation have improved dramatically .
References 1. Etnyre, Lee M., Finding Oil and Gas from Well Logs, Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p. 161, 1989. 2. Bradley, Howard B., Petroleum Engineering Handbook, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Richardson, Texas, 3rd edition, pp. 49-14, 49-15, 1992. 3. Etnyre, pp. 94-95. 4. Ibid. 5. Debrandes, Robert, Encyclopedia of Well Logging, Editions Technip, Paris, France, pp. 150-151, 1985. 6. Debrandes, p. 9 Reservoir: a subsurface, porous, permeable rock body in which oil and/ or gas is stored. Most reservoir rocks are limestones, dolomites, sandstones, or a combination of these. The three basic types of hydrocarbon reservoirs are oil, gas, and condensate. An oil reservoir generally contains three fluids – gas, oil, and water – with oil the dominant product. In the typical oil reservoir, these fluids occur in different phases because of the variance in their gravities. Gas, the lightest, occupies the upper part of the reservoir rocks; water, the lower part; and oil, the intermediate section. In addition to its occurrence as a cap or in solution, gas may accumulate independently of the oil; if so, the reservoir is called a gas reservoir. Associated with the gas, in most instances, are salt water and some oil. In a condensate reservoir, the hydrocarbons may exist as a gas, but, when brought to the surface, some of the heavier ones condense to a liquid.

Publishing in 2005 International Conference Computer Graphics and Imaging (CGIM 2005)

Paper number: 478-020

Pumper

n. [Well Workover and Intervention]
A mobile high-pressure pumping unit commonly used for cementing or stimulation operations. Most pump units are configured with a high-pressure triplex pump and one or more centrifugal pumps to precharge the triplex pump and handle displacement fluids.

Triplex Pump

n. [Well Workover and Intervention]
A positive-displacement reciprocating pump that is configured with three plungers. Triplex pumps are the most common configuration of pump used in both drilling and well service operations. Pumps used in well service activities generally are capable of handling a wide range of fluid types, including corrosive fluids, abrasive fluids and slurries containing relatively large particulates.

Frac Pump

n. [Well Workover and Intervention]
A high-pressure, high-volume pump used in hydraulic fracturing treatments.

Mud Pump

F series (Emsco) mud pumps of various sizes up to 1600HP and 5000psi. Delivery 3-6 months. Our price is start from $60,000 and the price is negotiable.

Scope of Application

Mud pump is used to circulate the mud during the drilling.

Examples:

We just listed two type of F-1300 and F-1600 mud pump ,which are mainly used in the drilling liquid circulating system, the nominal well depth is between 3500m and 7000m (10,000 ft ~ 20,000 ft)

Features

The type of F-1300 and F-1600 mud pump, used the mature advanced technology and the advanced structure in home and abroad,transmission gear system on the power end are the high hardness involute herringbone gears, with high gear ratio, anticorrosion, high strength, high efficiency,the hydraulic end used the hard airproof structure, which makes the reliability of airproof is high,the lubricating system used dual return circuit structures, which raise the lubricating effect, and lengthen the life span,through optimizing the design of the shell and main structure makes the structure more reasonable, maintaining more convenient, performance more stable, and furthermore ,have the merits of low frequency, long stroke, large displacement.

Execution Standard and Certificate

The main components of this product accord with the correlated standards of API Spec 7K??Specification for Drilling Equipments? and ?Triplex Single Acting Mud Pump?, and in Sept.2002, this product acquired the authorization to use Official API Monogram.

Pumping Units

Pumping Units of All Sizes. Delivery 2-3 months. Our price is start from $10,000 and the price is negotiable. Examples: C25-56-36; C40-89-36; C40-89-42; C-80-133-54; C-80-109-48; C-114-173-64; C-114-143-74; C-160-143-74; C-160-173-74; C-160-173-86; C-228-143-100; C-228-173-100; C-228-213-120; C-228-246-86; C-320-256-100; C-320-256-120; C-320-305-100; C-320-173-120; C-320-213-120; C-456-213-144; C-456-256-144; C-456-213-168; C-456-305-144; C-640-256-168; C-640-256-192; C-640-305-168; C-640-365-144; C-640-305-192; C-912-365-168; C-912-365-192; C-912-365-240

Plunger Pump

Plunger pumps for stimulation etc. of various sizes up to 1600HP and 15000psi. Delivery 4-6 months. Our price is start from $80,000 and the price is negotiable.

This is a list of free and open-source software for geological data handling and interpretation. The list is split into broad categories, depending on the intended use of the software and its scope of functionality.

Notice that 'free and open-source' requires that the source code is available. Simple being 'free of charge' is not sufficient—see gratis versus libre.

Well logging & Borehole visualisation[edit]

Name	Description	Originator	License	Platforms	Language	Notes
SGS-Geobase [1]	Drilling data logger that can interface with SGS Genesis	SGS Canada Inc.	GPL	Windows & Microsoft Access	Microsoft Access VBA	Microsoft Access is not necessary, the free runtime is sufficient. Simple graphical interface, Integrity reinforcement, Reporting tools, Satellite Database, Database Validation, Assays QA/QC management with graphics.

Geosciences software platforms[edit]

Name	Description	Originator	License	Platforms	Language	Notes
GeoTriple for Oil&Gas Exploration	Geo-sciences Software platform (data management, display and process)	Geoforge project	LGPL	Cross-platform	Java	Interfaces with WorldWind and JFreeChart

Geostatistics[edit]

Name	Description	Originator	License	Platforms	Language	Notes
Gstat[3]	Geostatistical modeling and simulation	Utrecht University	GPL	Cross-platform	C/C++	Interfaces with GRASS
gslib[4]	Geostatistical modeling and simulation	Stanford University	MIT	Fortran 77
PyGSLIB[5]	Python module for geostatistical modeling, designed for mineral resource estimation	Opengeostat Consulting	MIT/GPL	Windows, Linux and OSX	Fortran 95, Cython and Python	It has functions for drillhole calculations, block modeling, wireframing and geostatistics with modified gslib code linked into python

Forward modeling[edit]

Name	Description	Originator	License	Platforms	Language	Notes
Virtual Geoscience Workbench[6]	Finite-discrete element modeler	Jiansheng Xiang and others	LGPL	Windows	C#, C++

Geomodeling[edit]

Name	Description	Originator	License	Platforms	Language	Notes
GeoSyntax[7]	Reservoir modeling	CSIRO Australia - June Hill	CSIRO 'MIT/BSD' (academic)	Microsoft Windows	Java
GeoBlock[8]	Reservoir modeling	Pavel Vassiliev	MPL	Microsoft Windows	Embarcadero Delphi	Exact terms not clear
GeoTrace[9]	Tracer modeling	Muhammed Celik	Microsoft Windows	Visual Basic	Exact terms not clear
Albion[10]	3D model reconstruction and visualisation from boreholes based on QGIS GIS Platform	Oslandia[11] and Areva	GPLv2 or later	Microsoft Windows and Linux	Python

Visualization, interpretation & analysis packages[edit]

Name	Description	Originator	License	Platforms	Language	Notes
Dapple[12]	Virtual globe for geoscientists	Geosoft Inc.	MIT	Windows	Originated in NASA World Wind
Generic Mapping Tools[13]	Map generation and analysis	Lamont-Doherty and University of Hawaii	GPL	Cross-platform	C	Implemented in OpendTect
GPlates[14]	Interactive visualization of plate tectonics	University of Sydney, Caltech, NGU	GPL	Cross-platform	C++, Python	Implements GPML
OpenStereo[15]	Geoscience plotting tool	Carlos Grohmann, University of São Paulo	GPL	Cross-platform	Python	Depends on NumPy and Matplotlib
SvgNet[16]	Stereographic and Spherical Projections	Arijit Laik[17]	public domain	WebApp	JavaScript	Depends on JavaScript, HTML5 and SVG support in browser
OpendTect[18]	Geoscience interpretation and visualization	dGB Earth Sciences	GPL or custom	Cross-platform	C++	Interfaces with GMT
ParaViewGeo[19]	Geoscience extension of ParaView Includes readers and filters	KitwareParaView, Objectivity Originally MIRARCO	BSD	Cross-platform	C++, Python	Adds specific readers, stereo toolbar, slideshow capability and mining and geology oriented filters to Paraview
PuffinPlot[20]	Paleomagnetic data visualization and analysis	Pontus Lurcock	GPL v3	Cross-platform	Java	Desktop GUI and Jython scripting interface.

Geographic information systems (GIS)[edit]

Genso suikoden ii ost download. This important class of tools is already listed in the article List of GIS software.

Not true free and open-source projects[edit]

The following projects have unknown licensing, licenses or other conditions which place some restriction on use or redistribution, or which depend on non-open-source software like MATLAB or XVT (and therefore do not meet the Open Source Definition from the Open Source Initiative).

Name	Description	Originator	License	Platforms	Language	Notes
VGeST[21]	Discontinuum modeling	ICL and QMUL	Not obvious	Microsoft Windows	C#?	Previously known as VGW
Javageo[22]	Multidisciplinary interpretation tool	Goen Ghin	Not clear	Cross-platform	Java (software platform)
Noddy[23]	3D geological and geophysical modeling	Tectask, IUGS	Custom permissive license	Microsoft Windows	C++	Uses proprietary XVT libraries; requires (free) registration
RGeostats[24]	Geostatistical R Package	Didier Renard (Mines-Paristech)	LICENSE	Cross-platform	R (programming language)	Free R Package
Flumy[25]	Forward reservoir models for meandering channelized systems	ARMINES - Mines-Paristech	LICENSE	Cross-platform	C++	Free demonstration version
BasinVis[26]	Basin visualization of sedimentary fill and subsidence	Eun Young Lee, Johannes Novotny	LICENSE	Cross-platform	Matlab
Geomodelr[27]	Geological modelling from cross sections	Geomodelr, Inc.	SaaS - AGPL	Cross-platform	Python	Allows creation of public geological models in its web platform for free and query the model with an Open Source Python Package
BGS Groundhog Desktop[28]	Geological modelling from cross sections	British Geological Survey	OGL - Open Government Licence	MS Windows	Java	Free to use software to digitize geological cross-sections, and display and edit borehole logs
LOGitEASY	Cloud-based field logging software, boring log software, geologic cross section software	https://logiteasy.com	Free/ Pay-As-You-Go/ Subscription	Windows, Mac OS, iOS, Android	PHP, Java	Based on USCS Soil Classification Standard, allows generating instant PDF boring logs and geologic cross sections from the data logged using the LOGitEASY eForm

References[edit]

1. ^http://www.geostat.com/genesis/en/download.php
2. ^http://www.geoforge.org/prt/product/gtr4oxp/gtr4oxp_about.html
3. ^http://gstat.org
4. ^http://gslib.com
5. ^'opengeostat/pygslib'. GitHub. Retrieved 2016-09-09.
6. ^http://sourceforge.net/projects/vgw/
7. ^https://data.csiro.au/dap/landingpage?pid=csiro:10810
8. ^http://geoblock.sourceforge.net/
9. ^http://www.geoseis.tr.gg/
10. ^https://github.com/Oslandia/albion
11. ^http://oslandia.com
12. ^http://dapple.geosoft.comArchived 2006-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
13. ^http://gmt.soest.hawaii.edu
14. ^http://www.gplates.org
15. ^http://www.igc.usp.br/index.php?id=openstereo
16. ^https://svgnet.github.io
17. ^https://github.com/arijitlaik
18. ^http://opendtect.org
19. ^http://paraviewgeo.objectivity.ca
20. ^Lurcock, P. C. and G. S. Wilson (2012), PuffinPlot: A versatile, user-friendly program for paleomagnetic analysis, Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 13, Q06Z45, doi:10.1029/2012GC004098
21. ^http://vgest.net
22. ^http://javageo.com
23. ^http://www.tectonique.net/tectask/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=23
24. ^http://cg.ensmp.fr/rgeostats
25. ^http://cg.ensmp.fr/flumy
26. ^http://geologist-lee.com/basinvis.html
27. ^https://geomodelr.com
28. ^https://www.bgs.ac.uk/research/environmentalModelling/groundhogDesktop.html